Purpose
This document establishes the professional operating standards, personnel expectations, and code of conduct for Naval Star Command. It is written to give the organization a clear military-style framework for official operations, training events, recruiting, discipline, readiness, and command accountability, while staying aligned with the public doctrine already stated by Naval Star Command and Task Force Nova.[1]
Command Principles
1. Command Authority
All official operations shall be conducted through an established chain of command. Orders issued by the commanding officer, executive officer, fleet command staff, task group commanders, detachment leads, and mission leaders are binding during active operations unless the order is unlawful within platform rules, technically impossible to execute, or creates an immediate preventable loss of friendly personnel or assets.[1][2]
Questions, disagreement, or alternate plans shall be raised at the appropriate time and through the proper channel. During an active operation, members are expected to execute first and debate later, except in cases involving immediate operational danger, confirmed friendly-fire risk, collision risk, or mission compromise.[2]
No member may bypass the chain of command in order to seek a more favorable ruling, avoid correction, or undermine the authority of an assigned leader. Repeated attempts to ignore assigned leadership may result in counseling, retraining, suspension from operations, reduction in billet, or removal from the organization.[2]
2. Unity of Effort
Naval Star Command exists to conduct coordinated fleet activity, not a loose collection of individual players acting independently. Once assigned to an operation, every pilot, marine, medic, engineer, scanner operator, and logistics specialist is part of a single mission system and is expected to support the commander's intent over personal preference.[1][3]
Members shall understand the difference between initiative and freelancing. Initiative means acting in support of mission intent when communications are delayed or conditions change; freelancing means abandoning formation, changing objectives, or engaging targets without authorization and without operational necessity.[3]
3. Mission Command
Commanders should issue orders that are clear, practical, and tied to mission purpose. Leaders are expected to communicate the objective, main effort, acceptable risk, and fallback conditions so subordinate elements can continue acting effectively even if direct contact is interrupted.[1]
Subordinate leaders are responsible for translating commander intent into actionable tasking for their assigned elements. Failure to brief properly, assign responsibilities, or maintain accountability over assigned personnel is a leadership deficiency and may be corrected through review or reassignment.[1][2]
Security and Information Control
4. Operational Security
Mission-critical information shall remain within approved organizational channels. This includes staging points, deployment times, ship manifests, route plans, mission-specific loadouts, escort assignments, personnel issues, command disagreements, intelligence reports, and contingency procedures.[1]
Naval Star Command's public charter explicitly supports restricted data sharing between semi-autonomous units in order to limit organization-wide compromise. Internal standards shall therefore treat unnecessary disclosure as an operational failure, not merely a social mistake.[1]
Members may not leak screenshots, recordings, tactical maps, internal planning notes, disciplinary matters, or private command communications outside approved channels without explicit command authorization. Where recording is permitted for training, reporting, or after-action analysis, personnel shall be informed in advance and such material shall be handled as controlled internal content unless released by command.[2]
5. Identity Protection and Internal Trust
Personnel shall not impersonate command authority, falsify rank, misrepresent billet authority, or claim approval they do not possess. Any attempt to create confusion in command relationships, manipulate orders, or spread false guidance is grounds for immediate disciplinary review.[1]
The organization's doctrinal emphasis on verification over assumption requires members to verify sensitive information through approved sources rather than rumor, hearsay, or partial screenshots. When in doubt, members shall confirm information with their immediate chain rather than acting on speculation.[1]
Readiness Standards
6. Readiness and Punctuality
All members assigned to an official event are expected to report on time, properly equipped, and ready to begin at the stated muster time. "Ready" means physically present in the required voice channel, attentive to briefing, equipped for the assigned role, and capable of deploying without avoidable delay.[1]
Members who cannot attend are expected to notify their chain of command or the event coordinator as early as possible. Late notice may be excused when caused by real-life circumstances, but habitual lateness, no-shows, or last-minute withdrawal without explanation harms operational reliability and may affect billet eligibility.[2]
Command may establish readiness states for events, such as muster, pre-flight, launch-ready, combat-ready, and extraction-ready. Members are expected to understand these states and report accurately rather than claiming readiness prematurely.[3]
7. Equipment and Role Preparation
Personnel shall report with ships, armor, weapons, tools, medical supplies, and support equipment appropriate to the mission profile. Members are responsible for knowing the standard kit for their role and for asking questions before deployment if guidance is unclear.[2]
Pilots must know the capabilities and limitations of their assigned craft, including fuel endurance, shield profile, weapons employment, cargo constraints, and crew support requirements. Multicrew personnel must know station duties before launch, not during first contact.[2][3]
8. Qualification and Training
No member shall be treated as fully mission-qualified solely because they own a ship or have prior game experience. Naval Star Command shall maintain internal qualification standards for basic orientation, communications, flight discipline, formation keeping, turret or crew coordination, infantry integration, casualty response, and emergency extraction procedures.[1][2]
A minimum training pipeline should include:
- Recruit orientation, covering doctrine, chain of command, communications, attendance, and conduct.
- Basic flight or crew qualification, covering navigation, rendezvous, launch sequencing, docking, recovery, and emergency response.
- Mission-role certification, covering the specific duties of fighter, escort, logistics, dropship, marine, medic, reconnaissance, or command support personnel.
- Advanced exercise participation, allowing access to higher-risk operations only after baseline competency has been demonstrated.[2][3]
No recruit should be assigned to advanced operations without demonstrated ability to follow instructions, hold formation, communicate clearly, and understand assigned responsibilities. Qualification authority should rest with designated instructors, division leads, or command-appointed examiners.[2]
Communications Standards
9. Comms Discipline
Voice communications during official operations shall remain clear, concise, and relevant to mission execution. Members shall avoid cross-talk, side conversations, repeated interruptions, open-mic noise, and emotional argument while an operation is active.[2]
The preferred communications order is: urgent safety traffic first, command directives second, tactical contacts third, status updates fourth, and nonessential commentary last. During combat or high-workload phases, nonessential commentary may be suspended entirely by command.[2][3]
Personnel should use short, repeatable reporting formats whenever possible, such as contact type, bearing, range, status, damage, fuel state, and support requirement. Members are expected to acknowledge direct orders clearly and avoid ambiguous replies.[3]
10. Channel Discipline and Reporting Etiquette
Each voice or text channel used for an operation should have a designated purpose. Members shall remain in the channel assigned to their team, flight, bridge crew, or command element unless moved by leadership or instructed to relay information elsewhere.[2]
Training events require the same or greater discipline than combat operations because they build habits. Unauthorized joining of instructional channels, interrupting an instructor, or talking over qualification staff undermines training quality and may result in removal from the session.[2]
Flight, Fleet, and Ship Standards
11. Ship Discipline
All ships committed to an official operation are subject to the mission plan and assigned command relationships, regardless of ownership. Members may retain property ownership, but once a vessel is formally assigned to an op, its movement, position, escort relationship, and tactical use are governed by the designated leader.[2][3]
Unauthorized ship launch, premature quantum movement, unapproved landing, careless collision, abandoning station, or changing ship assignment without permission constitutes a procedural breach. Pilots are expected to preserve both their own platform and the wider mission package.[2]
12. Formation and Maneuver
Fleet elements shall operate in formation when mission conditions allow. Naval lore for Star Citizen describes battle groups built around a major ship with escort and support elements, and squadron organization into multiple flights, which offers a practical model for Naval Star Command fleet doctrine.[3]
Standard formation doctrine should include at minimum:
- Lead element, responsible for navigation and tempo control.
- Main asset or primary objective ship, such as carrier, cargo ship, command ship, or troop ship.
- Escort screen, responsible for immediate defense and interception.
- Recon or picket element, responsible for early contact reporting and forward sensing.
- Logistics or recovery element, responsible for sustainment, recovery, and extraction support.[3]
Members shall maintain assigned spacing, approach vectors, and maneuver discipline unless ordered to break formation. Independent pursuit is prohibited unless approved or required by immediate survival conditions.[3]
13. Navigation and Movement Control
Movements between staging, transit, objective, and extraction phases shall be briefed before departure. Command should specify primary route, alternate route, regroup points, abort criteria, and rally locations in case of separation.[1]
No element should leave the group transit plan without reporting. If separated by navigation error, interdiction, technical failure, or combat displacement, the affected member shall report position, condition, and recovery ability as soon as practicable.[3]
Combat Standards
14. Combat Behavior
Combat operations shall be deliberate and controlled. Personnel are expected to identify targets before firing, observe target priority, maintain awareness of friendly positions, and avoid panic actions that create confusion or friendly-fire exposure.[2][3]
Mission leaders may define rules of engagement based on operation type, such as defensive fire only, target interdiction, disable-and-board, convoy defense, or full engagement authority. Personnel shall not escalate beyond the assigned rules of engagement without command authorization unless immediate self-defense requires it.[3]
15. Fire Discipline and Target Prioritization
Targets should be prioritized according to threat to mission success, threat to protected assets, and ability to disrupt command and sustainment. As a general doctrine, immediate threats to the main asset, electronic disruption sources, hostile interceptors, boarding craft, and anti-support threats take precedence over opportunistic engagements.[3]
No member may chase kills at the expense of assigned protection duty. Personal scorekeeping, reckless pursuit, or refusal to disengage when ordered is incompatible with fleet discipline.[2]
16. Boarding, Ground, and Mixed-Environment Operations
When operations involve marines, boarding teams, or joint ship-ground action, one supported command relationship shall be designated in advance. The supported commander may be naval, marine, or mission-specific, but all attached elements shall know who has tactical authority for the objective phase.[2]
Personnel shall not stack at airlocks, rush breaches without assignment, or abandon casualty accountability during boarding actions. Medical, security, and extraction responsibilities must be designated before insertion.[2]
Personnel Standards
17. Uniform, Identity, and Presentation
Members participating in official ceremonies, training evolutions, fleet reviews, recruiting events, or public operations shall use the organization's accepted identifier, rank presentation, and call-sign format. Standardizing external presentation supports cohesion, recognition, and the unit's military simulation identity.[1]
Command may establish approved uniforms, armor palettes, ship liveries, patch usage, or title formatting for formal events. Variations may be permitted for mission-specific function, but visible role clarity should be preserved whenever practical.[1]
18. Billets and Professional Responsibility
Every member shall know their assigned billet and the basic duties attached to it. A billet is not a status badge; it is an accountability position tied to planning, execution, reporting, training, or support.[2]
Members who accept leadership billets are expected to mentor subordinates, maintain rosters, brief their people, and communicate issues upward early. Members who want the privileges of rank but avoid the obligations of leadership are not meeting the standard.[2]
Conduct and Discipline
19. Professional Conduct
Respect toward all personnel is mandatory. Harassment, racism, sexism, slurs, humiliation, persistent hostility, or toxic behavior directed at members, recruits, allies, or guests is incompatible with service in the unit and may result in immediate disciplinary action.[2]
Disagreement may occur, especially in training and after-action review, but it must remain professional. Members shall critique performance, decisions, and processes without attacking identity, dignity, or good-faith participation.[2]
20. Accountability and Correction
Command should use a graduated discipline system when appropriate, balancing fairness with the needs of readiness and cohesion. Corrective options may include verbal counseling, informal warning, formal written warning, temporary restriction from operations, retraining, reduction in billet, reduction in rank, or separation from service.[2]
Severe misconduct, deliberate sabotage, malicious disclosure, impersonation of command, repeated harassment, or intentional compromise of unit safety may justify immediate suspension pending command review.[1][2]
21. Privacy and Evidence Handling
Members shall respect privacy in private channels, direct messages, command discussions, and disciplinary matters. Recordings, screenshots, and captured conversations may only be distributed when approved for evidence, training, or command review, and context shall be preserved so material is not used in a misleading way.[2]
Reporting and Review Standards
22. After-Action Review
Every significant operation should conclude with a structured after-action review. At minimum, the review should identify mission objective, outcome, key events, command decisions, major successes, preventable failures, losses, and training actions required before the next sortie.[1][2]
After-action review is not a venue for public humiliation. Its purpose is to preserve institutional learning, correct repeat errors, reward effective performance, and improve doctrine. Leaders are expected to distinguish between unavoidable friction and negligent performance.[2]
23. Documentation and Lessons Learned
Command staff or designated scribes should maintain concise records of major training events, operational incidents, disciplinary decisions, and doctrine updates. Naval Star Command's public charter already emphasizes final reporting and warning behavior under compromise conditions, which supports a culture of formal documentation rather than informal memory.[1]
Reports should be factual, time-bounded, and specific. Members submitting reports are expected to separate observation from interpretation and include enough detail to support command decisions.[1]
Emergency and Continuity Standards
24. Emergency Protocol and Succession
If command structure is disrupted, unavailable, compromised, or fragmented, subordinate officers and senior noncommissioned personnel shall fall back to pre-briefed continuity procedures. Naval Star Command's public charter specifically authorizes lower-ranking officers to use legacy codes and deprecated pathways to secure fleet assets during high-level compromise.[1]
Emergency continuity doctrine should prioritize the following in order unless the mission dictates otherwise:
- Preservation of personnel.
- Protection or recovery of the main asset.
- Preservation of navigational, operational, and intelligence records.
- Orderly extraction of surviving elements.
- Reestablishment of communications with the next valid authority.[1]
25. Autonomous Action Under Degraded Command
Task-organized units may act semi-autonomously when cut off, but only within the last confirmed commander's intent and established emergency procedures. Autonomy is not permission for disorder; it is controlled independence designed to preserve force integrity until reporting lines are restored.[1]
Code of Conduct
The following Code of Conduct applies to all members, recruits, guests participating in official activities, and any personnel operating under Naval Star Command authority.
1. Integrity
Speak truthfully, report accurately, and do not fabricate readiness, qualifications, combat results, attendance, or disciplinary facts. A professional organization cannot function if its members make command decisions harder by hiding reality.[1]
2. Respect
Treat all personnel with dignity, even during disagreement, correction, or failure. Respect is the minimum standard, not an earned privilege.[2]
3. Discipline
Follow orders, maintain formation, respect briefing structure, and carry out assigned duties without forcing others to compensate for negligence. Discipline is the habit that turns a collection of players into a functioning unit.[2][3]
4. Reliability
Show up when committed, communicate when unavailable, and be honest about capability. Reliability is a core measure of trustworthiness in a fleet environment.[2]
5. Confidentiality
Protect internal information, private communications, and operational planning. Loose talk, careless screenshots, and unauthorized leaks damage trust and expose the unit to avoidable risk.[1][2]
6. Competence
Train seriously, ask questions early, and work to improve weaknesses. No member is expected to know everything immediately, but every member is expected to improve.[2]
7. Stewardship
Respect ships, equipment, channels, time, and the effort of other members. Shared organizational assets and shared preparation time are part of the unit's combat power.[2]
8. Accountability
Own mistakes, accept correction, and improve after review. Excuses, blame-shifting, and public defensiveness weaken both the individual and the organization.[2]
9. Representation
When operating publicly under Naval Star Command's name, act in a way that reflects professionalism, discipline, and credibility. Members represent the unit in spectrum posts, in-game encounters, allied events, and recruiting spaces.[1]
10. Service
Place mission success, team cohesion, and the long-term strength of the organization above ego, vanity, or personal spotlight. The organization should reward those who make the unit stronger, not merely louder.[1][2]
Recommended Enforcement Framework
To make these standards usable, Naval Star Command should pair them with a simple enforcement structure:
- Informal correction: For first-time minor issues such as light comms clutter, readiness mistakes, or etiquette problems.[2]
- Formal warning: For repeated minor issues or a single meaningful standards violation.[2]
- Retraining or temporary restriction: For qualification failure, repeated unreliability, or procedural negligence that affects operations.[2]
- Reduction in billet or rank: For abuse of authority, repeated chain-of-command violations, or persistent failure in leadership responsibilities.[2]
- Removal from service: For harassment, malicious disclosure, sabotage, impersonation, or severe conduct failures that undermine safety and trust.[2][1]
Command Closing Statement
Naval Star Command should present these standards not as decorative roleplay text, but as a working agreement that defines how members prepare, deploy, communicate, fight, review, and conduct themselves. That approach is consistent with the organization's public identity as a military simulation unit and with its doctrinal emphasis on verification, resilience, autonomous continuity, and structured reporting under pressure.[1]